arkitect: (16)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-11-09 02:39 am (UTC)(link)
Not to my knowledge... though theirs is a team I do not have contacts within. I am unfamiliar with how many of them have acted.

[me immediately realizing this could go two ways:]

So if you mean to ask of their number of members, I am afraid I would not know that, either.
Edited 2020-11-09 02:40 (UTC)
arkitect: (pic#14393020)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-11-09 03:13 am (UTC)(link)
The latter should not be a problem. I do not specifically know anyone in their team, but my understanding is that every team should have been asked to organize carefully by now. The first concern will be if they fail to be cautious.

[there's always the chance someone goes off the string.]

The second concern will be if anyone from a team with lower numbers should splinter, in addition.
arkitect: (25)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-11-09 03:31 am (UTC)(link)
Ensuring the two that have not met the requirement target different teams ought to be possible-- and then any splintering becomes less a concern. Manageable enough, provided a line of communication is open between them.
arkitect: (Default)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-11-09 04:09 am (UTC)(link)
As should we all be, at this juncture. We have little time for much else.
arkitect: (pic#14393020)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-11-09 04:16 am (UTC)(link)
To complete the requirement we are all aware of, and ensure the path will be opened for the dead. It is my understanding that we may have to do so before our path beyond that becomes apparent, as it seems we are learning of little else that must be done for now... though that is a guess, not a certainty.

[a slight wave of one hand.]

I have not forgotten the mentions made of this beast which may need to be dealt with, but 'tis best to focus on what we may accomplish rather than looking too far ahead.